• Home
  • id blog
  • SSRO vs IVRO: Jaw Surgery Explained at ID Hospital Korea

SSRO vs IVRO: Jaw Surgery Explained at ID Hospital Korea

SSRO vs IVRO: Jaw Surgery Explained at ID Hospital Korea

 

Hi, this is Riley from ID Hospital! 👋

If your face looks asymmetrical or your lower jaw protrudes more than it should,
the issue may go beyond simple appearance—it could be a structural imbalance of your jawbone.

In these cases, orthodontic treatment alone may not solve the problem, and repositioning
both the upper and lower jaw—commonly known as orthognathic surgery—might be necessary.

Orthognathic surgery is performed to correct skeletal issues such as underbite, overbite,
weak chin, or facial asymmetry. By adjusting the position of the maxilla (upper jaw) and
mandible (lower jaw), the surgery improves both aesthetics and functional issues like bite alignment.

Among these procedures, mandibular surgery plays a significant role, especially
when lower jaw imbalance is present. Today, we’re breaking down two major mandibular surgery techniques you’ll often hear about:

 

👉 SSRO vs IVRO

Let’s make it simple. 😉

 

What is Mandibular Surgery?

Mandibular surgery involves cutting the back area of the lower jawbone and repositioning
it so the mandible moves into the correct alignment with the maxilla.

Compared to full orthognathic surgery that moves both jaws, mandibular surgery alone reduces
the surgical area by half—making the procedure more focused and less invasive overall.

 

There are two primary methods used:

✔ SSRO (Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy)

✔ IVRO (Intraoral Vertical Ramus Osteotomy)

 

Both aim to correct jaw position—but the surgical approach, recovery, and benefits are quite different.

 

SSRO (Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy)

<IMG https://eng.idhospital.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/img-twojaw-lowerjaw-01.png>

SSRO splits the jawbone from front to back, creating two thin bone plates that can be moved and repositioned.
The wide bone contact surface allows for stable bone healing, and rigid fixation with metal plates means no need for long-term intermaxillary fixation (jaw wiring)—allowing patients to return to daily life sooner.

Because of its stability and convenience, SSRO is often the first-choice technique over IVRO.

However, surgeons need to be cautious when the nerve runs close to the jawbone since SSRO may carry a higher risk of nerve sensitivity changes.

 

SSRO Highlights

  • Strong bone fixation
  • Faster recovery
  • Allows forward or backward jaw movement
  • More stable than IVRO
  • Higher chance of temporary nerve sensation changes

 

IVRO (Intraoral Vertical Ramus Osteotomy)

<IMG https://eng.idhospital.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/img-twojaw-lowerjaw-02.png>

IVRO cuts the posterior part of the jaw vertically.
The biggest advantage? A much lower risk of nerve damage, regardless of nerve location.

But because IVRO does not allow for strong fixation with plates, patients must undergo temporary intermaxillary fixation (jaw wiring) until bone healing progresses.
After the fixation is removed, rehabilitation exercises are required—resulting in a longer recovery period.

IVRO is usually selected when SSRO is not possible due to nerve proximity or jaw shape.

 

IVRO Highlights

  • Lower nerve damage risk
  • Shorter surgical time
  • Helpful for TMJ (jaw joint) conditions
  • Requires jaw fixation after surgery
  • Less stable than SSRO

 

SSRO vs IVRO — Quick Comparison

Surgery Type Pros Cons

SSRO
(Sagittal Split
Ramus Osteotomy)

  • Can move jaw forward or backward
  • Stable fixation
  • Faster recovery
  • Higher chance of nerve sensitivity changes
  • Not suitable for all anatomical shapes
IVRO
(Intraoral Vertical
Ramus Osteotomy)
  • Much safer for nerves
  • Shorter operation time
  • Beneficial for TMJ issues
  • Requires jaw fixation
  • Longer recovery
  • Less stability compared to SSRO

 

 

Choosing Between SSRO vs IVRO: Why Analysis Matters More Than Preference

The difference between SSRO vs IVRO is not about choosing what the patient prefers—it’s about choosing what works best for their actual jaw structure.

Factors that must be evaluated include:

  • Facial asymmetry level
  • Bone thickness & nerve positioning
  • Bite condition (occlusion)
  • TMJ condition
  • Jaw shape
  • Overall facial balance

Using the wrong surgical method for your jaw structure may reduce results and lead to discomfort or prolonged recovery. Accurate diagnosis always comes first.

 

How to Choose a Hospital for Mandibular Surgery

Jaw surgery requires precision and safety. Before deciding, make sure to check:

✔ Whether the hospital provides detailed diagnostic tests

✔ The surgeon’s experience and surgical portfolio

✔ Whether a full-time anesthesiologist is present

✔ If the hospital has a systematic safety & aftercare system

Skill matters—but safety matters more.

 

Before and After

#Case 1. Before & After (3Months)

#Case 2. Before & After (7Months)

💬 Riley’s Note

Choosing between SSRO vs IVRO is never a one-size-fits-all situation.
Your TMJ condition, bite pattern, asymmetry level, age, and healing ability all influence the optimal method.

With accurate diagnosis and planning, orthognathic surgery can offer both functional and aesthetic improvement—and long-lasting stability.

 

👉 Learn More

If you want more surgery information, Click to Orthognathic Surgery in korea at ID Hospital

Mandibular Surgery

 

If you need more detailed assistance, click here.
👉 https://forms.gle/xy1Nr3XNu3DmCXNs5

2 responses to “SSRO vs IVRO: Jaw Surgery Explained at ID Hospital Korea”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *